Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.abortion    |    Abortion sucks... literally    |    4,310 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,188 of 4,310    | ||
|    trailerpark.com to All    | ||
   Same dickhead Nebuchadnezzar II |    30 Jun 06 10:31:53    |     |    From: @              Dean Reduced to Heading Web Grassroots, Analyst Says       By Randy Hall       CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor       June 30, 2006              (CNSNews.com) - The chairmen of national political parties usually serve as       major spokesmen on a wide variety of issues, but because of a series of       controversial remarks, current Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard       Dean has been reduced to heading up Internet grassroots, a political analyst       told Cybercast News Service.              During a speech this week at a religious conference, even Dean appeared wary       of speaking for the party he chairs.              "I don't want to speak for the whole Democratic Party because every time I       do, I get in trouble, so I'll speak for myself," Dean said in Washington,       D.C., on Tuesday. During Dean's speech, he predicted that America was "about       to enter the '60s again." See Video              Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics,       said that such controversial comments have reduced Dean to being "the       'netroots' chairman of the DNC (Democratic National Committee); you know,       the blogging community and associated powers within the Democratic Party."              "Look, it's no secret that [House Minority Leader] Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)       and [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid (D-Nev.) have had their differences       with Dean," Sabato stated. "So have [Sen. Chuck] Schumer (D-N.Y.), the head       of the senatorial committee, and [Rep.] Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), the head of       the congressional committee.              "Once you eliminate those groups, as well as the Senate Democratic Caucus or       the House Democratic Caucus, I think you're left with two things: the       netroots and some of the state parties," he added.              Sabato also referenced Dean's strategy for financing political campaigns.              "Remember where he's put the money," Sabato noted. "He's got this 50-state       plan, and he's determined to put Democratic resources in Mississippi and       Utah. Well, maybe one day they'll be voting Democratic for president. I'll       be dead then, but it may happen."              Paul Herrnson, director of the Center for American Politics and Citizenship       at the University of Maryland, took a more clinical view of Dean's tenure at       the DNC.              "In a situation when the party does not control the White House, it's       unclear whether that person is the spokesman for the party," Herrnson said.              "Most people would look to the party leadership in the House and the Senate       first because those are elected officials in high-ranking positions that are       said to represent the party and were actually elected by voters and other       elected officials," he added.              "The party chairman is generally considered the major party functionary in       terms of collecting resources to conduct campaigns," Herrnson noted, stating       that Dean is "raising money and spending money to build up the party's       infrastructure and to prepare for the 2006 and later 2008 elections."              As Cybercast News Service previously reported, Dean's tenure at the DNC has       been marked by several verbal missteps.              On June 2, 2005, he alleged that Republicans offered a "dark, difficult and       dishonest vision" of America and that President George W. Bush had been the       "most ineffective" president in Dean's lifetime.              Several Democratic governors and members of Congress began denouncing Dean's       comments, including Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who responded to Dean's       statement that the GOP was "pretty much a white, Christian party" by       accusing the DNC chairman of using "religion to divide."              On Wednesday night, Obama was asked on Fox News Channel's "Hannity and       Colmes" whether he agreed with Dean's statement from Tuesday that Republican       governance had thrust America into a new "McCarthy era."              "I think that, as far as I can tell, nobody is being blacklisted," Obama       replied. However, the Illinois senator also appeared to rally to Dean's       side.              "There is a mood in the country where dissent is considered unpatriotic, and       I think that's a dangerous move," Obama said. "We can have vigorous       disagreements without assuming that, you know, the other side is somehow       venal or doesn't love their country, and I think that's probably what Howard       was trying to address."              Over the past several months, Dean has attempted to reach out to groups that       do not usually vote for Democrats, including religious conservatives. To       that end, the DNC chairman was interviewed on the Christian Broadcasting       Network's "700 Club" on May 10.              During that appearance, Dean erroneously stated that his party's platform       defined marriage as being between one man and one woman. The remark sparked       a "gay backlash" that led some homosexual activists to call for supporters       of same-sex marriage to funnel their money to sympathetic candidates and not       the DNC.              Sabato noted that Tuesday's appearance by Dean before the conference on the       "Covenant for a New America" was a further attempt by the DNC chairman to       reach the religious community with an eye toward the mid-term elections in       November and his own political future.              "If the Republicans actually end up holding their own or gaining seats,       there will be pressure for him to leave, no question about it," Sabato said.       "There'll be pressure for a whole bunch of people to leave, but it would       start with Dean."              Sabato asserted that the odds are in the Democrats' favor this year because       it marks the sixth year of George W. Bush's presidency.              "There's only been one sixth-year election since 1900 without gains by the       opposition party, usually substantial gains, and that was 1998 because of       two factors: backlash on impeachment and the fact that [President Bill]       Clinton and the Democrats had lost everything that wasn't nailed down in       1994," he said.              Either way, Dean's future is likely to be determined by the party's       presidential nominee in 2008, Sabato noted.              "Of course, it just depends on who that is and what his or her priorities       are," he said. "If that nominee wants to send a certain message about the       mainstreaming of the Democratic Party, then the nominee may well ask him to       leave.              "On the other hand, if that mainstream nominee is worried about the       alienation of the Left and their turnout in November, he may get to stay,"       Sabato added.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca