XPost: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican   
   From: NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@hotmail.com   
      
   On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:10:59 GMT, "Nebuchadnezzar II"   
    wrote:   
      
   >"Starkiller©"  wrote in message   
   >news:2vm9v255tsmc6k3qvmt7euuda614ksmu81@4ax.com...   
   >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:20:21 GMT, "Nebuchadnezzar II"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>"Daniel"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:1173672897.599166.238990@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>> On Mar 12, 12:12 am, "Nebuchadnezzar II"   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>> "Daniel"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> news:1173671161.270612.304010@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> > On Mar 11, 8:23 pm, "Nebuchadnezzar II"   
   >>>>> >    
   >>>>> > wrote:   
   >>>>> >> Quite a few Bush apologists are squealing about Clinton firing   
   >>>>> >> US   
   >>>>> >> Attorneys.  The fact is Clinton never fired a single US   
   >>>>> >> Attorney.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> > Of course, you are lying. But that is nothing new.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The link definitively proves it and was prepared by a federal   
   >>>>> government   
   >>>>> agency, but I see you'd rather stay ignorant and falsely accuse   
   >>>>> others   
   >>>>> of lying.  This behavior is nothing new for Reichtards.  If that's   
   >>>>> the   
   >>>>> bed you choose to lay in, be my guest.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The FATC that Clinton fired EVERY US attorney cannot be refuted, but   
   >>>> if you think you can, be my guest.   
   >>>   
   >>>If you want to believe that and wallow in your ignorance, I don't   
   >>>care.   
   >>>It's a ridiculous premise.  Be sure and tell everyone you know about   
   >>>your revelation.  I'm particularly amused when Reichtards demonstrate   
   >>>their ignorance and I'm sure there are others around you who are just   
   >>>as   
   >>>amused.   
   >>>   
   >> The Clinton administration fired all 93 US attorneys.   
   >   
   >The Bush administration fired all 93 US attorneys in 2001.   
   >   
   >Both statements are equally true, but both are also inaccurate.  Bush   
   >replaced every single one of the 93 US Attorneys when he took office in   
   >2001 just as Clinton did in 1993.  Every single one of them was a   
   >Democrat and every single one of them knew they would be replaced by a   
   >Republican if a Republican won the Presidency and that's exactly what   
   >happened.  All of this is beside the point.  If you don't know how and   
   >why Presidential appointments work, you should better educate yourself.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> The Bush administration fired 7   
   >   
   >Actually 8.   
   >   
   >> Ya'll want to say that Bush fired the attorneys then it is fair to say   
   >> the same about Clinton since it was the Justice Department in both   
   >> instances that did the actual firing.   
   >   
   >No it's not.  If you believe as much, you are wrong.  Between 1981 and   
   >2006, only two US Attorneys were fired.   
      
   Janet Reno fired 93 US Attorneys.   
   Look it up.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   >> OR   
   >> Since Clinton technically fired no attorneys then it must be said that   
   >> Bush technically fired no attorneys therefore ya'll are bitching over   
   >> nothing.   
   >   
   >Wrong again.  The Bush administration fired or demanded the resignation   
   >of 8 US Attorneys.   
   >   
   >   
   The Justice Department fired the Attorneys.  Not Bush personally.   
    If you have proof of otherwise then please post it.  Otherwise you're   
   doing nothing but playing with semantics.   
   Seems you want to apply one set of rules to one administration and   
   another to the next in order to suit your needs.   
      
      
   Regards   
      
      
   Starkiller©   
      
      
   Eta Kooram Nah Smech!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)