From: nauset023@yahoo.com   
      
   Snit wrote:   
      
   > "Steve Carroll"  wrote in   
   > fretwizz-160A4F.12044808072004@netnews.comcast.net on 7/8/04 11:04 AM:   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>>>Is that the Bush or Clinton context?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>MM context.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Under what context does Eminem get into this discussion?   
   >>>   
   >>>Hey I was speaking of MARILYN Monroe. ; )   
   >>>   
   >>>Hannah   
   >>   
   >>No you weren't. Snit just told you what you were speaking of. That's how   
   >>Snit 'tells' you what you were talking about... by asking a question. If   
   >>he planned to continue, he'd be asking you what relevancy Marilyn Monroe   
   >>had to Eminem :)   
   >   
   >   
   > Damn.  Caught red handed.  Oh wait.  Seems like you are stating what *my*   
   > views and actions are, in direct contradiction to may actual actions.   
   >   
   > You seem to be visiting the dictionary a lot recently.  Why not look up the   
   > word hypocrite... your picture might be there.  :)   
   >   
   >   
   >>This post, made by a woman who hasn't frequented csma much, sums Snit up   
   >>quite well in many respects:   
      
   Hey maybe I am not a woman, and am incognito. ; )   
      
   You two really have a thing going,huh?   
      
   Hannah   
   >>   
   >>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Snit+group:comp.sys.mac.advocacy+author   
   >>:ShutterBugz&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&selm=40449c98_1%40news.iprimus.c   
   >>om.au&rnum=1   
   >   
   >   
   > Ahhh, a post from one of your "friends" who come to your rescue, I assume?   
   > Be prepared... next Steve will post information about some of his other   
   > "friends", like Sigmond, his recent post as John (though not proven,   
   > likely), etc.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)