From: Rick@dot.dot
In article ,
Snit wrote:
> "Rick" wrote in Rick-5F30F2.12430417082004@news.telus.net on
> 8/17/04 12:43 PM:
>
> > In article ,
> > Snit wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Agreed. And unless you have any specific questions about the little story
> >> Elizabot and I just shared with you, I have no need to discuss it further.
> >> I see that you have asked a couple of questions above - if you want my
take
> >> on them I will share. If not, well there is no real reason for me to
> >> explain my view for Elizabot. :)
> >
> > No, no more questions for now. Both(? I don't know how many sides there
> > are here) sides seem too deeply entrenched for any meaningful discussion.
>
> I think getting to any "truth" at this point may be a challenge.
>
> I do think that Elizabot was right when she talked about what "set me off"
> to speak to the police... her comments about going to the police I found to
> be completely over the top. She disagrees... I suppose it is up to the
> reader to make their own choice.
> >
> > Ah, well... Had to at least try.
>
> LOL... if you want some real fun, ask Elizabot and the Steve's about there
> friend Sigmond. :)
NO. Not now. Not ever. I know better than to dip more than a toenail
into that!
Actually, that does seem to be the crux of the problem, but I think that
after all this time, that there is no painless way to defuse it.
Further, it seems that the only way to solve it is for someone to accept
some pain. (Note to onlookers: I am not indirectly suggesting I know who
made the post. Hell, I don't even know about the post myself!)
Actually, I'm still slightly surprised that nobody has claimed that I'm
[someone else's | their own] sockpuppet.
--
Rick...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
