From: Rick@dot.dot   
      
   In article ,   
    Wally  wrote:   
      
   > On 6/4/05 0:09, in article BE78064D.10137%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > > "Wally"  stated in post   
   > > BE78D81F.49B7%wally@wally.world.net on 4/5/05 9:02 AM:   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> On 5/4/05 23:09, in article BE77F855.10113%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   > >> "Snit"   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>    
   > >>   
   > >> Snit..   
   > >> Please, as agreed direct any further posts where you wish a reply to be   
   > >> forthcoming to alt.flame.macintosh, unless of course it is of a topic   
   > >> recognizable as Macintosh related in the strictest sense.   
   > >> Many thanks.   
   > >>   
   > > Just to be clear, are you willing to do the same?   
   >   
   > Of course.   
   >   
   > > I am happy to move our   
   > > conversations to AFM, but the last time I tried to do so you refused to   
   > > continue conversations there   
   >   
   > You mean 'here'! And of course there is no guarantee that we will engage in   
   > any conversation here, my agreement is simply that 'if' I do converse with   
   > you along previous lines it will not be in csma, that is after all the   
   > point.   
   >   
   > > as your goal is to disrupt CSMA.   
   >   
   > I have given Rick reason to believe that I will only make posts to you along   
   > the lines of our previous exchanges in alt.flame.macintosh, that is the   
   > case, and I will abide by that wholeheartedly, I will post to you in csma   
   > only if it is Mac related in the strictest sense, this condition will stand   
   > regardless of who besides you or I does or does not follow suit, but will be   
   > revoked the moment you take advantage of my goodwill in the form of any   
   > derogatory post in csma of what I consider a serious nature, but fear not I   
   > have a thick skin so I would not take that decision lightly.   
   >   
   > > Well, I am posting this to AFM - we shall see if you are willing to follow   
   > > and be reasonable.  I will be no - as that would not match your real goal.   
   >   
   > Please note that my action is simply an attempt to clean up csma on Ricks   
   > suggestion, as such, afm will take up very little of my time, and I will   
   > check in infrequently if at all.   
      
   Thank you Wally. I don't know if this will be successful, but I salute   
   you for trying! :)   
      
   --   
   RickG...   
   BTW - for those who don't like reading headers, my ISP is telus.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)