From: Rick@dot.dot   
      
   In article ,   
    Wally  wrote:   
      
   > On 7/4/05 21:19, in article BE7A817D.1069C%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > > "Wally"  stated in post   
   > > BE7B03F5.5FA1%wally@wally.world.net on 4/7/05 12:37 AM:   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> On 7/4/05 5:16, in article BE799FBE.102E3%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   > >> "Snit"   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> "Wally"  stated in post   
   > >>> BE7A3566.5E98%wally@wally.world.net on 4/6/05 9:53 AM:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 6/4/05 13:47, in article BE78C609.10206%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   > >>>> "Snit"   
   > >>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> "Rick G"  stated in post   
   > >>>>> Rick-08458F.22424905042005@news.telus.net on 4/5/05 10:42 PM:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>  Wally  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> On 6/4/05 0:09, in article BE78064D.10137%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   > >>>>>>> "Snit"   
   > >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> "Wally"  stated in post   
   > >>>>>>>> BE78D81F.49B7%wally@wally.world.net on 4/5/05 9:02 AM:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> On 5/4/05 23:09, in article   
   > >>>>>>>>> BE77F855.10113%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   > >>>>>>>>> "Snit"   
   > >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>    
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> Snit..   
   > >>>>>>>>> Please, as agreed direct any further posts where you wish a reply   
   > >>>>>>>>> to   
   > >>>>>>>>> be   
   > >>>>>>>>> forthcoming to alt.flame.macintosh, unless of course it is of a   
   > >>>>>>>>> topic   
   > >>>>>>>>> recognizable as Macintosh related in the strictest sense.   
   > >>>>>>>>> Many thanks.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Just to be clear, are you willing to do the same?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Of course.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> I am happy to move our   
   > >>>>>>>> conversations to AFM, but the last time I tried to do so you refused   
   > >>>>>>>> to   
   > >>>>>>>> continue conversations there   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> You mean 'here'! And of course there is no guarantee that we will   
   > >>>>>>> engage   
   > >>>>>>> in   
   > >>>>>>> any conversation here, my agreement is simply that 'if' I do converse   
   > >>>>>>> with   
   > >>>>>>> you along previous lines it will not be in csma, that is after all   
   > >>>>>>> the   
   > >>>>>>> point.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> as your goal is to disrupt CSMA.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> I have given Rick reason to believe that I will only make posts to   
   > >>>>>>> you   
   > >>>>>>> along   
   > >>>>>>> the lines of our previous exchanges in alt.flame.macintosh, that is   
   > >>>>>>> the   
   > >>>>>>> case, and I will abide by that wholeheartedly, I will post to you in   
   > >>>>>>> csma   
   > >>>>>>> only if it is Mac related in the strictest sense, this condition will   
   > >>>>>>> stand   
   > >>>>>>> regardless of who besides you or I does or does not follow suit, but   
   > >>>>>>> will   
   > >>>>>>> be   
   > >>>>>>> revoked the moment you take advantage of my goodwill in the form of   
   > >>>>>>> any   
   > >>>>>>> derogatory post in csma of what I consider a serious nature, but fear   
   > >>>>>>> not   
   > >>>>>>> I   
   > >>>>>>> have a thick skin so I would not take that decision lightly.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Well, I am posting this to AFM - we shall see if you are willing to   
   > >>>>>>>> follow   
   > >>>>>>>> and be reasonable.  I will be no - as that would not match your real   
   > >>>>>>>> goal.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Please note that my action is simply an attempt to clean up csma on   
   > >>>>>>> Ricks   
   > >>>>>>> suggestion, as such, afm will take up very little of my time, and I   
   > >>>>>>> will   
   > >>>>>>> check in infrequently if at all.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Thank you Wally. I don't know if this will be successful, but I salute   
   > >>>>>> you for trying! :)   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Hey!  Don't I get any credit for helping to pull Wally here, too!   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Uummmmm...NO!   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> Geeez... all my hard work is just taken for granted these days!   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>  Ain't life a bitch?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Naw, you and I both know the truth that you have finally, and thankfully,   
   > >>> accepted my idea to bring this type BS here.  I appreciate it.   
   > >>   
   > >> We both know who is responsible for me being here, but I do not wish to   
   > >> throw a spanner in the works if it will interfere with any 'help' you are   
   > >> receiving wrt your hallucinations, so I will make no more comment.   
   > >>   
   > > Feel free to look up who in CSMA pushed the idea to bring such useless   
   > > conversations here.  My meme.   
   >   
   > No need to go any further than this ng...who said?   
   >   
   > "I am happy to move our conversations to AFM, but the last time I tried to   
   > do so you refused to continue conversations there"   
   >   
   > So the first sentence shows your willingness to simply follow suit, and the   
   > second shows the miserable failure that your first attempt was.   
   >   
   > Your quest should you choose to accept it is to work out what, or who,   
   > provided the difference this time, have fun ;)   
   >   
   > By the way who or what is "meme"?   
   >   
   A meme is a play on words; what the gene is to organic life, the meme is   
   to culture. For example, there are people I know who grew up on the   
   other side of the continent but as kids they also sang that same "Jingle   
   Bells, Batman Smells" song. Nobody remembers where that song came from,   
   but all kids pick it up.   
      
   --   
   RickG...   
   BTW - for those who don't like reading headers, my ISP is telus.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)