From: wally@wally.world.net   
      
   On 10/4/05 9:41, in article BE7DD258.10F65%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit"   
    wrote:   
      
   > "Rick G"  stated in post   
   > Rick-7BF370.18211909042005@news.telus.net on 4/9/05 6:21 PM:   
   >   
   >> In article ,   
   >>  Snit  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "Wally"  stated in post   
   >>> BE7DB3F8.6594%wally@wally.world.net on 4/9/05 1:32 AM:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 9/4/05 15:31, in article BE7CD2E7.10E98%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   >>>> "Snit"   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "Wally"  stated in post   
   >>>>> BE7D87DA.4E01%wally@wally.world.net on 4/8/05 10:24 PM:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> This 'experiment' has not so much taught me something, but reinforced   
   >>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>> which I already suspected.....still never mind! ;=(   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> As for meme, I have thanked Rick for his assistance in that matter!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You thanked Rick, but not me... which shows your bias.  :)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Actually NO! What it shows is the fact that I ignored your alleged   
   >>>>>> attempt   
   >>>>>> at enlightenment for the simple reason that it was offered in such a   
   >>>>>> disingenuous manner   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Rude, perhaps, but disingenuous... no.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> IMO it was!... "a false appearance of frankness" I believe sums up your   
   >>>> effort nicely!   
   >>>   
   >>> You are welcome to your opinion - but I clearly offered you plenty of   
   >>> information about something you shared your ignorance about.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I even provided you with a good link   
   >>>>> that had a good short definition if that is all you wanted, but also had   
   >>>>> links to a lot more.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> , Rick's on the other hand....well....you can see the difference!, I am   
   >>>>>> fully   
   >>>>>> aware that this is a 'flame' ng but I fail to see why you need to make   
   >>>>>> every   
   >>>>>> comment of yours reflect that fact, it is quite puzzling to me.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Oh.  If you do not want me to flame you just say so... I kinda figured   
   >>>>> that   
   >>>>> was the point of a flame group.  I even commented on that:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I know that's what you figured, that is why my comment of..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> " Rick's on the other hand....well....you can see the difference!,"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Was sure to be wasted on you, again you prove me right, but it was worth a   
   >>>> try!   
   >>>   
   >>> Ah, I did a proper flaming - being that this is the group for such things -   
   >>> and Rick G. was not able to figure out how to be appropriate.  He always   
   >>> seemed smarter than that, but I suppose he just missed that one.   
   >>   
   >> [SNIP]   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> I am not interested in the number of posts to me - but I am interested in   
   >>> having conversations in CSMA and having the trolling be reduced... and that   
   >>> is happening.  Rick G. and now Dawg are trolling me there, but I will be   
   >>> sending my responses - at least some of them - to here.  That should keep   
   >>> their trolling down.   
   >>   
   >> Dude - reading is fundamental. Learn it, love it. Wrong Rick.   
   >   
   > Um, oops.  My apologies.   
   >   
   > Though you were the Rick who was helpful... you are *not* the one who has   
   > been trolling me.   
   >   
   > Sorry about that.   
      
   A post that isn't a flame......well done Snit see you can do it!.......even   
   if it was your inability to keep abreast of things that brought it   
   about....thanks for the giggle! LOL   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)