From: Rick@dot.dot   
      
   In article ,   
    Snit  wrote:   
      
   > "Rick G"  stated in post   
   > Rick-7BF370.18211909042005@news.telus.net on 4/9/05 6:21 PM:   
   >   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  Snit  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> "Wally"  stated in post   
   > >> BE7DB3F8.6594%wally@wally.world.net on 4/9/05 1:32 AM:   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On 9/4/05 15:31, in article BE7CD2E7.10E98%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   > >>> "Snit"   
   > >>>  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> "Wally"  stated in post   
   > >>>> BE7D87DA.4E01%wally@wally.world.net on 4/8/05 10:24 PM:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>> This 'experiment' has not so much taught me something, but reinforced   
   > >>>>>>> that   
   > >>>>>>> which I already suspected.....still never mind! ;=(   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> As for meme, I have thanked Rick for his assistance in that matter!   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> You thanked Rick, but not me... which shows your bias.  :)   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Actually NO! What it shows is the fact that I ignored your alleged   
   > >>>>> attempt   
   > >>>>> at enlightenment for the simple reason that it was offered in such a   
   > >>>>> disingenuous manner   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Rude, perhaps, but disingenuous... no.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> IMO it was!... "a false appearance of frankness" I believe sums up your   
   > >>> effort nicely!   
   > >>   
   > >> You are welcome to your opinion - but I clearly offered you plenty of   
   > >> information about something you shared your ignorance about.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> I even provided you with a good link   
   > >>>> that had a good short definition if that is all you wanted, but also had   
   > >>>> links to a lot more.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> , Rick's on the other hand....well....you can see the difference!, I am   
   > >>>>> fully   
   > >>>>> aware that this is a 'flame' ng but I fail to see why you need to make   
   > >>>>> every   
   > >>>>> comment of yours reflect that fact, it is quite puzzling to me.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Oh.  If you do not want me to flame you just say so... I kinda figured   
   > >>>> that   
   > >>>> was the point of a flame group.  I even commented on that:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I know that's what you figured, that is why my comment of..   
   > >>>   
   > >>> " Rick's on the other hand....well....you can see the difference!,"   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Was sure to be wasted on you, again you prove me right, but it was worth   
   a   
   > >>> try!   
   > >>   
   > >> Ah, I did a proper flaming - being that this is the group for such things   
   -   
   > >> and Rick G. was not able to figure out how to be appropriate.  He always   
   > >> seemed smarter than that, but I suppose he just missed that one.   
   > >   
   > > [SNIP]   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> I am not interested in the number of posts to me - but I am interested in   
   > >> having conversations in CSMA and having the trolling be reduced... and   
   that   
   > >> is happening.  Rick G. and now Dawg are trolling me there, but I will be   
   > >> sending my responses - at least some of them - to here.  That should keep   
   > >> their trolling down.   
   > >   
   > > Dude - reading is fundamental. Learn it, love it. Wrong Rick.   
   >   
   > Um, oops.  My apologies.   
   >   
   > Though you were the Rick who was helpful... you are *not* the one who has   
   > been trolling me.   
   >   
   > Sorry about that.   
      
   No worries. It's a burden that we, the praenomenous must bear.   
      
   --   
   RickG...   
   BTW - for those who don't like reading headers, my ISP is telus.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)