From: wally@wally.world.net   
      
   On 16/4/05 3:31, in article BE8564BB.12181%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit"   
    wrote:   
      
   > "Wally"  stated in post   
   > BE86322D.9FE8%wally@wally.world.net on 4/15/05 12:06 PM:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> On 15/4/05 23:42, in article BE852EFF.12050%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   >> "Snit"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "Wally"  stated in post   
   >>> BE85CB6A.9FB0%wally@wally.world.net on 4/15/05 4:48 AM:   
      
   >>> In your opinion.   
   >>   
   >> Yes you read it correctly..." It is my opinion that....."   
   >   
   > As long as we do not pretend it is based on reason, I have no problem with   
   > that.   
      
   I doubt anyone could stop you pretending...what else do you have?   
      
   >>>   
   >>> Funny thing is, though, you admit that Elizabot has admitted to at least   
   one   
   >>> mistake (though you will not say which one!) and she has not even   
   >>> apologized, no less explained it.   
   >>   
   >> Wrong! Elizabot hasn't to my knowledge admitted to a mistake, imo what she   
   >> has admitted to is so far removed from a mistake that the word isn't on the   
   >> same page.   
   >   
   > So you do not think it is a mistake to steal an image, edit it, and repost   
   > it to a public forum?   
      
   How many times must I answer that question before my answer actually sinks   
   in?   
      
   >  OK... your idea of what is right and wrong is not the   
   > same as mine.  I clearly have a stricter sense of morality.   
      
   I live in hope that one day you will actually get to experience it.   
      
   >>   
   >>> The facts do not fit your beliefs...   
   >>   
   >> They do.   
   >   
   > See, here you are pretending that your beliefs match reality... yet you can   
   > not support that.   
      
   I can, and I have.   
      
   >>> so you will simply play silly games.   
   >   
   > Which you will... and are.  You have made a claim, softened it by calling it   
   > your opinion, but then pretend it is based on facts... but will *never* back   
   > that up.   
      
   If I have done what you suggest, then you should have no problem showing   
   where I stated that  "Elizabot has admitted to at least one mistake" as it   
   is your claim that I did say that, put it to the test who's reality stands   
   up to scrutiny! ...Yours or mine?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)