From: wally@wally.world.net
On 16/4/05 14:59, in article BE8605C8.12247%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,
"Snit" wrote:
> "Wally" stated in post
> BE86A798.A06A%wally@wally.world.net on 4/15/05 8:30 PM:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16/4/05 3:31, in article BE8564BB.12181%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID, "Snit"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Wally" stated in post
>>> BE86322D.9FE8%wally@wally.world.net on 4/15/05 12:06 PM:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 15/4/05 23:42, in article BE852EFF.12050%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,
>>>> "Snit" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Wally" stated in post
>>>>> BE85CB6A.9FB0%wally@wally.world.net on 4/15/05 4:48 AM:
>>
>>>>> In your opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Yes you read it correctly..." It is my opinion that....."
>>>
>>> As long as we do not pretend it is based on reason, I have no problem with
>>> that.
>>
>> I doubt anyone could stop you pretending...what else do you have?
>
> Your insult shows a lack of understanding of my comment. Not surprising...
Wrt your comments I agree, not surprising at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Funny thing is, though, you admit that Elizabot has admitted to at least
>>>>> one
>>>>> mistake (though you will not say which one!) and she has not even
>>>>> apologized, no less explained it.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong! Elizabot hasn't to my knowledge admitted to a mistake, imo what she
>>>> has admitted to is so far removed from a mistake that the word isn't on
the
>>>> same page.
>>>
>>> So you do not think it is a mistake to steal an image, edit it, and repost
>>> it to a public forum?
>>
>> How many times must I answer that question before my answer actually sinks
>> in?
>
> You have answered the question in regard to having it done to me...
Am I wrong in thinking that that is what this thread is all about?
> will you
> answer it as a general question. Of course not - that would show your
> hypocrisy. Let's try one more time, though:
>
> In general, do you think it is a mistake to teal an image, edit it, and
> repost it to a public forum?
>
> The only real question, of course, is how you will dodge the question - you
> will not answer, will you?
I have answered!, I have stated categorically that in your case I see no
problem with it, does it really have to be spelt out to you that in other
cases I may have a problem with it?
>>
>>> OK... your idea of what is right and wrong is not the
>>> same as mine. I clearly have a stricter sense of morality.
>>
>> I live in hope that one day you will actually get to experience it.
>
> Your insult shows a lack of understanding of my comment. Not surprising...
Wrt your comments I agree, not surprising at all.
>>>>
>>>>> The facts do not fit your beliefs...
>>>>
>>>> They do.
>>>
>>> See, here you are pretending that your beliefs match reality... yet you can
>>> not support that.
>>
>> I can, and I have.
>
> But you will not point to a single example. You seldom if ever do.
>>
>>>>> so you will simply play silly games.
>>>
>>> Which you will... and are. You have made a claim, softened it by calling
it
>>> your opinion, but then pretend it is based on facts... but will *never*
back
>>> that up.
>>
>> If I have done what you suggest, then you should have no problem showing
>> where I stated that "Elizabot has admitted to at least one mistake" as it
>> is your claim that I did say that, put it to the test who's reality stands
>> up to scrutiny! ...Yours or mine?
>
> You and I have agreed about her dishonest and despicable actions,
No we haven't! Can you support your contention that I find Elizabot's
actions " dishonest and despicable"? ....I think not!
> but then
> you excuse them based on the fact that she did them against me.
Get a grip Snit, I don't need to excuse that which I do not have a problem
with.
> That shows your lack of logic and rationality.
Please don't use words you clearly don't understand.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
