From: wally@wally.world.net   
      
   On 22/4/05 22:43, in article BE8E5BB9.1378A%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   "Snit"  wrote:   
      
   > "Wally"  stated in post   
   > BE8EF64D.AA4F%wally@wally.world.net on 4/22/05 3:40 AM:   
   >   
   >   
   >>>> < Snits proven lies snipped>   
   >>>   
   >>> I see that once again you felt the need to dishonestly snip my content.   
   >>   
   >> You never learn do you? You really shouldn't make it this easy for me, but,   
   >> if you insist....EVERY word that I snipped from what you laughingly call   
   >> your "content" in your last post was dealt with in previous posts...'EVERY   
   >> SINGLE WORD' why would I not snip that which had already been dealt with   
   >> having demolished every point in it previously?, the fact that you have   
   >> nothing to say on your behalf but the same old stuff is disappointing but   
   >> understandable! So to ensure there is no doubt and for a Google record here   
   >> is what I snipped, which you refer to as "my content". LOL   
   >   
   > That is where this whole thread has made it to, Wally - it has gotten old.   
   > There is nowhere else for this thread to go   
      
      
      
   I can only assume that something about your past 'mental problems' have left   
   you in such a state Snit, as I refuse to believe anyone would lower   
   themselves for something so minor as a ng thread willingly, but you have no   
   such restrictions, your self respect must be nothing more than a memory, and   
   I have trodden in stuff with more moral fiber than you, It is disappointing   
   to see someone capitulate so easily, but at least it serves to prove that my   
   opinion of you was the correct one all along.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)