From: wally@wally.world.net   
      
   On 24/4/05 12:37, in article BE90709C.13F81%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   "Snit"  wrote:   
      
   > "Wally"  stated in post   
   > BE914078.AC7A%wally@wally.world.net on 4/23/05 9:21 PM:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> I now consider any agreement made wrt a.f.m at an end .   
   >> I will direct any posts of mine 'designed' to flame to a.f.m, but I will not   
   >> consider any post a flame simply because it is directed at any particular   
   >> poster even though this poster indulges in behavior that does fit the flame   
   >> definition, i.e.....simply denying that which is obvious and undeniable,   
   >> such as proof, explanations, or examples.   
   >   
   > If you stick to your word here, and do not actually flame in CSMA, I do not   
   > have a problem with that.   
      
   The problems that you actually have outweigh any problems you may or may not   
   think you have now or in the future, my 'word' as usual is restricted to   
   those that have the moral fortitude to appreciate my honesty that   
   accompanies it........you IMO do not fit that description!   
      
   > Likely, however, you will continue the flaming   
   > and trolling you have been doing in AFM but you will go back to doing it in   
   > CSMA.  I hope not - I hope you can keep your word... I just have grave   
   > doubts based on even your recent history.   
      
   What you "have" is for all to see.   
      
   >> I draw a distinction between flaming and simply denying reality, the latter   
   >> IMO should be condemned and be scrutinized by a wider audience.   
   >   
   > With your distinction and in regards to your recent games in AFM, do you   
   > think you have been flaming more or denying reality more?   
      
   My very involvement with a.f.m and specifically you would indicate that my   
   denial of the reality of the situation was in evidence, as I was quite   
   confident of the outcome, but I felt the risk of being wrong was worth the   
   effort.....frankly, I now know that it wasn't.   
      
   > I lean toward your having denied reality more, but I can see room for   
   > disagreement.   
      
   Don't worry it won't last!   
      
   >>   
   >> I invite you to examine the main thread in a.f.m for clarification.   
   >>   
   > LOL... Do you think Rick will disagree with the facts that you have been   
   > running from:   
      
   Rick is more than capable of making his own mind up without any comment from   
   you or I.   
      
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)