From: Rick@dot.dot   
      
   In article ,   
    Snit  wrote:   
      
   > "Rick G"  stated in post   
   > Rick-9981CA.22044023042005@news.telus.net on 4/23/05 10:04 PM:   
   >   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  Wally  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> I now consider any agreement made wrt a.f.m at an end .   
   > >   
   > > I do thank for for trying.   
   >   
   > In what way do you think he tried?   
      
   In the obvious manner, he confined the conflict to this group, rather   
   than CSMA. Were there other ways in which you believe he tried?   
      
   > >   
   > >> I will direct any posts of mine 'designed' to flame to a.f.m, but I will   
   > >> not   
   > >> consider any post a flame simply because it is directed at any particular   
   > >> poster even though this poster indulges in behavior that does fit the   
   > >> flame   
   > >> definition, i.e.....simply denying that which is obvious and undeniable,   
   > >> such as proof, explanations, or examples.   
   > >   
   > > So, are you still posting here? Just examples where you're intentionally   
   > > being rude? As opposed to examples where your simply trying to correct   
   > > Snit? It is interesting as I could see it being more than a 24/7 job.   
   >   
   > Trying to find errors in my comments would be challenging - and likely would   
   > take a 24/7 job and, perhaps, a research assistant or two.   
      
   Is that like the proverbial Bush II 24/7 job? 24 days a month 7 months a   
   year?   
      
   --   
   RickG...   
   BTW - for those who don't like reading headers, my ISP is telus.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)