From: wally@wally.world.net   
      
   On 25/4/05 9:57 PM, in article BE924571.144E2%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID,   
   "Snit"  wrote:   
      
   > "Rick G"  stated in post   
   > Rick-C89415.00002925042005@news.telus.net on 4/25/05 12:00 AM:   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>> I now consider any agreement made wrt a.f.m at an end .   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I do thank for for trying.   
   >>>   
   >>> In what way do you think he tried?   
   >>   
   >> In the obvious manner, he confined the conflict to this group, rather   
   >> than CSMA. Were there other ways in which you believe he tried?   
   >   
   > But he is admitting now that he will be heading back to CSMA   
      
   I have never left there!   
      
   > to cause trouble there, though he does not word it that way.   
      
   Then to say that I have admitted as much is a lie!   
   Is this an example of your 'mirror' analogy'? LOL   
      
   >  Then again, until he   
   > does so, perhaps he is just trying to add to the trouble in AFM... hmmm...   
   > we shall have to see.   
   >   
   > It is like a kid next to a cookie jar: even if they avoid stealing a cookie   
   > for a few days, if they tell you they will do so soon,   
      
   Or in your case if they don't tell you that, Simply lie and pretend that   
   they did! Then accuse them of stealing, don't worry about proof........'you'   
   never seem to need any!   
      
   > are they really trying not to steal a cookie?   
      
   Another dilemma for you to ponder!   LOL   
      
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I will direct any posts of mine 'designed' to flame to a.f.m, but I will   
   >>>>> not   
   >>>>> consider any post a flame simply because it is directed at any particular   
   >>>>> poster even though this poster indulges in behavior that does fit the   
   >>>>> flame   
   >>>>> definition, i.e.....simply denying that which is obvious and undeniable,   
   >>>>> such as proof, explanations, or examples.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So, are you still posting here? Just examples where you're intentionally   
   >>>> being rude? As opposed to examples where your simply trying to correct   
   >>>> Snit? It is interesting as I could see it being more than a 24/7 job.   
   >>>   
   >>> Trying to find errors in my comments would be challenging - and likely   
   would   
   >>> take a 24/7 job and, perhaps, a research assistant or two.   
   >>   
   >> Is that like the proverbial Bush II 24/7 job? 24 days a month 7 months a   
   >> year?   
   >   
   > No... look at the folks against me:   
      
   The vast majority of csma? That would take some time!   
      
   > they often need to get the help of their   
   > research assistant in order to even come close to making a "point" against   
   > me... and even then their claims are generally easy to shoot down.   
   >   
   > _________________________________________   
   > Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server   
   > More than 120,000 groups   
   > Unlimited download   
   > http://www.usenetzone.com to open account   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)