XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.os.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system   
   XPost: comp.sys.macintrash   
   From: jtmckee@rmac.know-spam-bogus.net   
      
   In article ,   
    GreyCloud wrote:   
      
   > Josh McKee wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article ,   
   > > GreyCloud wrote:   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>Josh McKee wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>>In article <9aydnfjKwY3O1hfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@bresnan.com>,   
   > >>> GreyCloud wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>Josh McKee wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>In article ,   
   > >>>>>GreyCloud wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Josh McKee wrote:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>In article   
   > >>>>>>>,   
   > >>>>>>>Derek Currie wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>[ snip ]   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>Below are a few personal thoughts, for whatever they are worth:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>1) Windows is really is a far less secure operating system than Mac.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>How much malware exists for Windows on the MIPS platform? The Alpha   
   > >>>>>>>platform?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Most likely that the hacker could recompile their viruses/malware for   
   > >>>>>>those platforms and the same results would happen.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>I didn't ask if it could be recompiled. I asked how much currently   
   > >>>>>exists. Still waiting for an answer.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>I don't know of any vendors currently selling Windows on MIPS.   
   > >>>>There are no Windows on Alphas anymore. And on the Alphas, windows NT   
   > >>>>could   
   > >>>>not compete   
   > >>>>against Tru-64 UNIX or OpenVMS for Alphas.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>Irrelevant.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>So the answer is no malware as there are no windows on both of said   
   > >>>>platforms.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>Are you saying that there is none? None at all? None for an OS you claim   
   > >>>is so weak in security? How can this be?   
   > >>   
   > >>Because they don't exist.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Why not? You do know that we're talking about Windows...right?   
   > >   
   > Yes, we're talking about windows.   
      
   Then why can't you name a single piece of malware? Weren't you   
   championing the notion of how insecure windows is? Using > 100K pieces   
   of malware to support your assertion? Now you can't even give a single   
   example. Therefore, applying your "logic" Windows is just as secure as   
   OS X. Is this really what you're trying to say?   
      
   Josh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|