Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.psychiatry    |    Shrinks can never be trusted    |    2,131 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,417 of 2,131    |
|    Element 115 to All    |
|    Re: !! U.K. Finally Declares Niggers Ins    |
|    17 Sep 07 16:20:37    |
      XPost: soc.culture.african.american, soc.culture.british, sci.psychology       XPost: alt.psychology       From: ufo@cometcult.org              Martin.Looter.Kingfish@Commie.Whoremonger.Plagiarists.edu wrote...       > Researchers carrying out the largest       > ever study of psychosis tested the       > claim that psychiatrists were discrim-       > inating against black patients. They       > found that, even when the ethnicity of       > the patient was unknown, psychosis       > was still diagnosed nine times more       > often in black people: almost exactly       > the same rate as their presence within       > mental health services.       >       > The study has, according to Professor       > Robin Murray from the Institute,       > shown that misdiagnosis, supposedly       > resulting from ‘institutionalised       > racism’, is a myth. On the contrary,       > “psychiatrists in the UK are less likely       > to diagnose psychosis in somebody       > who is black than white with the       > same symptoms”.              Has anyone considered that if the opposite were true - that UK blacks were       less likely to be diagnosed with psychosis than UK whites - that they       would be complaining about the failure to detect serious but treatable       mental disorders in black people and that the result was negligence on the       part of psychiatrists who obviously didn't care enough about their black       patients to pay enough attention to notice their psychotic behavior?              Still, the first paragraph quoted above makes me wonder how they did a       comparison to a group of patients whose ethnicity was unknown to the       psychiatrists who diagnosed them as psychotic. Is it common practice in       the UK for psychiatrists and other doctors to evaluate and treat patients       without actually seeing them in person? Even in the worst U.S. HMOs from       hell the patient is still seen by a semi-human nurse practitioner, and       even if he/she doesn't record the patient's race in his file, it still is       pretty obvious from both name and appearance.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca