home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.psychiatry      Shrinks can never be trusted      2,131 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,556 of 2,131   
   Jeff L to Pixie   
   Re: Kids On Drugs: Antidepressants And R   
   24 Apr 08 11:14:20   
   
   b821b039   
   XPost: alt.religion.scientology, alt.suicide.methods, alt.suicide.holiday   
   XPost: sci.med.psychobiology   
   From: jeffrey.latham@gmail.com   
      
   Pixie wrote:   
   > On Apr 24, 8:40 am, Jeff L  wrote:   
   > hahaha not as ignorant as you, it doesnt take too much of a brain cell   
   > to figure out if one is going to reply to a post, you hit the reply   
   > button under the post you are RESPONDING TO! geez, maybe you should   
   > review how to use ngs!   
      
   No, I was responding to YOUR defense of the ignorant spammer who   
   produced this thread. Do you or do you not assert that antidepressants   
   cause violent behavior?   
      
   Pixie wrote:   
   > and you never cited any evidence that this assertion is false when i   
   > asked you to, therefore you are not defending your position at all.   
   > anyway, there is no "logic of her position" she was citing evidence,   
   > something i havent seen you do.   
      
   Demonstrating false logic doesn't require one to "produce evidence".   
      
   Pixie wrote:   
   > she cited evidence, you didnt. therefore you have to supply evidence   
   > that her evidence is false through scientific studies of her theory,   
   > um, which you didnt provide.   
      
   The evidence she "cited" was her blog.   
      
   Pixie wrote:   
   > well, thats one piece of evidence you didnt supply, isnt it?   
      
   Invalid. A youtube clip purporting to be from a doctor is not a reliable   
   source. If she wants to prove her point, she needs to point to published   
   medical journals and peer-reviewed studies. Has she done that? No.   
   Hence, bullshit.   
      
   Pixie wrote:   
   > thats marketing babe, suck it up. surely you have seen marketing you   
   > dont like before havent you?   
      
   No, this is called "spam", and I'm quite sure her webhost would be very   
   interested in her usenet activities...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca