XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, misc.rural, alt.agnosticism   
   XPost: alt.philosophy   
      
   On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 Goo wrote:   
      
   >Fuckwit David Harrison - Goo, to one and all - continually lies about   
   >"considering" and "appreciating" that farm animals "get to experience   
   >life."  He mock-piously insists that this is a "benefit" for them, that   
   >they "get something out of the arrangement."   
   >   
   >There are two fatal defects in this claim.  First of all, it's illogical   
   >nonsense.  The animals do not "benefit" from coming into existence, no   
   >matter what level of welfare they experience during their lives.  A   
   >high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared with never existing.  No   
   >animal is "better off" as a result of existing, versus never existing.   
   >This is obvious.   
      
       Tell us how you think "He" is preventing you from benefitting   
   from your existence Goo. Go:   
      
   >It's even obvious to GooFuckwit Harrison,   
      
       Not yet Goober but now would be an excellent time to explain   
   how you think "He" is keeping you down so you can make it   
   obvious to everyone. Go:   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)