XPost: sci.med.diseases.lyme, alt.support.child-protective-services,   
   alt.support.autism   
   From: franciad@online.no   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:1111097780.379875.95930@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   >> The WTC attack was set up by the CIA. The Pentagon attack was set up   
   > by the CIA.   
   >   
   > Really. To what end?   
      
   To be able to safe face whilst warding off the greatest danger to the US   
   civilization ever, Peak Oil.   
   Taking a hit from some raving Saudi fundi's and then occupying a totally   
   unrelated country that has the world's cheapest-to-produce oil and the   
   world's largest proven reserves and the world's most weakened people (10   
   years of sanctions).   
      
   > I guess all you'll have left now it your claim those were faked by the   
   > CIA, right?   
      
   Those are not pictures of the Pentagon crash.   
      
      
   > You haven't really seen the devestation created by a 500 lb bomb, have   
   > you Frank?   
    Now be honest. Because I have. I've been on crews that   
   > dropped them.   
      
   I have been on the ground as they were being dropped.   
   Gagra, 1992. 30,000 people died during that short conflict. Including one of   
   my friends and several aquaintances.   
   Thanks to the meddling of the good ol' US of A, I might add.   
      
      
   > I have a better question. Why would investigators NOT pull tapes and   
   > confiscate them for examination? They should be fired if they DON'T.   
   > It's too easy to tamper with or lose such evidence. Ask a cop.   
      
   Evidence?   
   Are you saying a living soul has actually been allowed to SEE that tape?   
      
   > Un, after a few hours AVGAS is consumed and doesn't burn anymore, and   
   > only available fuel present prior to the impact would be left to burn.   
   > Not much of that kind of material in either the Pentagon or the Twin   
   > Towers, by design, I've heard rumored.   
      
   When was the cleanup of tons of unburnt aviation fuel?   
   (hint: there wasn't)   
      
   > Wings  quite flimsy compared to fuselages, and fuselages aren't all   
   > that hard for that matter. Ever touch an aircraft? It always scares me   
   > to fly, knowing how flimsy they are, really. Given me an axe, and I bet   
   > I could be through one side of an airliner and out the other in under   
   > 20 minutes, and barely break a sweat.   
      
   Ever heard of kinetic energy?   
   Where are the impact marks of the wings?   
   Where is the slight damage caused by those flimsy wings that came with   
   almost the speed of sound crashing into the Pentagon with the energy of a   
   few thousand SUV's driving at 100 mph?   
      
      
   >> Where are the engines?   
   >   
   > The recovered some. Why do you ask?   
      
   They haven't.   
   Link please.   
      
   Engines doe NOT disintegrate.   
      
      
   > No, that is not true. That aircraft flew for some time, burning off   
   > fuel, and the plane was only partially imbedded in the building.   
      
   Link to pictures please.   
   There wasn't any airplane.   
      
      
   > distance. I've been in the building. I'm ex-USAF.   
      
   You're a cowardly murderer.   
   A sperm-swallowing whore for Big Oil.   
      
      
   > Car sized hole? R R R R...sure, Frank. The Super Hummer, perhaps, the   
   > size of an airliner.   
      
   I have posted the picture once, I have no time now.   
   It's the size of a fraction of the diameter of the hull of a medium-sized   
   passenger plane.   
   Just big enough to drive a peugeot-205 through, or an Austin Mini.   
   Perfectly round and no damage whatsoever around it.   
      
   > Well, that that is not broken down into smaller parts is right there in   
   > other pictures. In fact it's a wonder they got as much as they did. How   
   > much debris do you think remains when a fragile thin shell of aluminum   
   > with a set of spidery struts holding it in shape hits a solid mortar   
   > and wood building the size of the Penagon?   
      
   Exactly everything, only in smaller and larger fragments.   
   Truckloads upon truckloads of debris.   
   An entire plane worth's.   
      
   > "Hundreds of tonnes of debris?" melted and burned. Given the heat   
   > produced by AVGAS in bulk, in an enclosed space like would be created   
   > by the cavity in the Pentagon, I'd say that much of the metals and   
   > other content, mostly, by the way, PLASTIC, you twittering conspiracy   
   > blutto, burned off. Vaporized.   
      
   Any idea at what temp. Aluminium "evaporates"?   
      
      
   > Along with the easily incinerated human remains of some 60 people or   
   > so.   
      
   Totally impossible at the low temps achieved and there wasn't even a fire.   
      
    > Well, this has been fun. I suppose I get to earn your suspicion now as   
   > a "secret government agent following you around from ng to ng to   
   > discredit your exposure of this vast conspiracy, by the evil forces of   
   > government."   
      
   Bullshit - you're just a twat thinking he knows something.   
   Go read the next door kid's elementary physics books and then come back with   
   your crazy theories about evaporating titanium-Aluminium alloys.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)