XPost: alt.religion.scientology, sci.skeptic, alt.suicide.holiday   
   From: h@r.c   
      
   "Abby"  wrote in :   
   : |-|erc wrote:   
   :   
   : >   
   : > You made a sweeping statement of which you know nothing about.   
   :   
   : Err...the very first post in this thread was a sweeping statement.   
   : This ng is full of them.   
   : >   
   : > ---I'm for choices in treating mental   
   : > ---health, Scientology is not.   
   : >   
   : > Are you implying that the current laws support choices in treating   
   purported mental conditions?   
   :   
   : I'm implying no such thing.  Perhaps that's what you inferred, but not   
   : what I implied.  My POINT, since you can't seem to find it, is that   
   : Scientology wants to take away a choice.  This ng is about scientology,   
   : therefore, I try to keep my posts focused on scientology and not   
   : whatever you want me to talk about.   
      
   So the 'demise of scientology' would not infact give people free choice re   
   mental health?   
      
   Even though you spout   
   : > ---I'm for choices in treating mental   
   : > ---health, Scientology is not.   
      
   So you're saying.....  I had an ulcer, then I ate a cheeseburger!   
   I'm for getting $1,000 a week pay, the planet Jupiter is not!   
      
      
   :   
   : > Nobody cares if your 1 particular case worked out, that's meaningless when   
   the topic is the global scale of things.   
   : > Sure the police put your boyfriend away because he called you a bitch,   
   that doesn't mean the system always works.  >You're going   
   from 1 personal case to a sweeping statement, argumento egocentrous.   
   :   
   : You're going from a post about my experience to a broad topic about   
   : government and mental health, offtopicus idiotica.   
      
   Ahhh touchee!   
      
   Herc   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)