Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.psychiatry    |    Shrinks can never be trusted    |    2,131 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 629 of 2,131    |
|    Rudy Canoza to moonspeak@hotmail.com    |
|    Re: Dogs and self-awareness    |
|    04 Oct 05 15:24:56    |
      XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.animals.dog, rec.pets.dogs.behavior       From: someguy@ph.con              moonspeak@hotmail.com wrote:              > Rudy Canoza wrote:       >       >>moonspeak@hotmail.com wrote:       >>       >>       >>>notgenx32@yahoo.com wrote:       >>>       >>>       >>>>moonspeak@hotmail.com wrote:       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>>Rudy Canoza wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>>moonspeak@hotmail.com wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>Rudy Canoza wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>Dogs just sniff things automatically, and for       >>>>>>>>most dogs, that yields information.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>So how do you explain retreiver dogs that sniff to find the shot bird       >>>>>>>and once the bird is found, they stop sniffing and walk towards the       >>>>>>>hunter?       >>>>>>       >>>>>>Not psychological/philosophical awareness of a sense of       >>>>>>smell, that's for sure.       >>>>>       >>>>>Then how?       >>>>       >>>>Simple conditioned response. NOT because the dog is       >>>>psychological/philosophical aware of a sense of smell.       >>>       >>>       >>>I'd still like to hear Rudy's reasoning. According to Rudy, sniffing is       >>>not a response, but something that just happens.       >>       >>You fucking idiot: didn't I just *say* it's       >>conditioned response?       >       >       > Sorry, I didn't know that "notgenx32@yahoo.com" and "Rudy Canoza" was       > the same individual.       >       >       >>Learn to read, dope. It's a       >>*conditioned* response. The dog has no philosophical       >>or psychological awareness of it. It is exactly like       >>your earlier example of plant leaves following the sun.       >       >       > So dogs do not sniff because that just what dogs do? It is then a       > response to something else. Therefore, if there is nothing to trigger       > the response, then the dog will not sniff, right? So if the dog lost       > it's sense of smell, what will trigger the dog to sniff?              It's a little of both. It's an instinct - a dog       doesn't have to be taught to sniff at things - and it's       a conditioned response, in that most dogs obtain       information from sniffing.              A dog that loses its sense of smell will continue to       try to sniff at things, indicating it has no       meta-awareness of "sense of smell".              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca