XPost: alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox, sci.psychology.personality   
   From: me@myself.com   
      
   Psychiatry is thus defined:   
      
   How to attack your enemy without him realise he is being attacked, How to   
   disable your enemy without him fighting back, how to kill your enemy without   
   the body dying.   
      
   It has nothing to do with treating anything it is just a way to get rid of   
   somebody and it has been used for thousands of years.   
      
   Mendoza the mass muderer killed people by removing their frontal lobes in   
   order to steal their money and then be cause of a murder charge, Hyneck who   
   was his friend wrote book after book of wonderful prose of lies and   
   fictional success stories to protect Mendoza from the death penalty.   
      
   The usual reason for hospitalise some is to steal their money or protect the   
   enemy of the hospitalised victim.   
      
   It is also used by governments and holder of high office to remove   
   opposition as in the profumo affair, the "plotters" are still lying in a   
   vegadive state because their brains have been destroyed. The church also use   
   it to remove any dissent because the incomes and jobs for life of the clergy   
   are dependant on absolute belief. Unfortunately because of the mixed up way   
   the British monachy were set up, (Henry 8 took over as leader of the English   
   church for political reasons) the "Establishment" requires that all Britons   
   "believe" (it means lip service) the Nicolician creed (I understand this was   
   a fringe group in the early church "Beware the Nicolecians"), doubting the   
   teachings of the Church is treason and so carries the death penalty. This is   
   carried out by psychiatry of brain destruction.   
      
   So freedom of speech, religion and democracy are not possible in Britian.   
      
   I witnessed an execution (of a completely innocent girl of 17) by "the   
   queens executioner" a few years ago and one of my friends (A nude   
   photographic model) was also executed and under the constitution when   
   Charles II was re-established by cromwells parliament around 1666 there was   
   was the arrangement that the monach was constitutional and was to have no   
   agents in the country. This law has been broken so under that act, the   
   parliament can act to (possibly) de-establish the monachy.   
      
   I no longer wish to be regarded as British and promise to keep the peace.   
      
   Chris.   
   "dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane"  wrote in message   
   news:mrqrg.186$2v.40@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...   
   > Olympiada wrote...   
   >> I totally disagree. Psychology is just as useful a profession as   
   >> psychiatry. Psychologists can evaluate patients for the need for drugs   
   >> and send them to psychiatrists for drugs. Why are you so bitter? You   
   >> are misleading people. Stop it.   
   >   
   > Misleading people?  Psychology has KILLED people, and here are two   
   > examples...   
   >   
   > One was a baby boy born in the 1950s or 1960s whose circumcision was   
   > botched and the resulting infection necessitated amputation of his   
   > penis.  The doctors who botched the circumcision invoked psychology   
   > to reassure his parents that the philosophy of behaviorism (B.S.   
   > Skinner) taught that all human traits were the result of environment,   
   > so all they had to do was raise him as a girl and he would become   
   > female.  He didn't become female, and played with trucks and toy   
   > soldiers and after puberty began thinking he was a lesbian because   
   > of his feelings towards girls.  They finally told him the truth, he   
   > changed his gender back to male, and finally committed suicide.   
   >   
   > Another example is some young girl who was killed by a psychological   
   > fad known as "rebirthing."  She had various emotional problems that   
   > the psychologists attributed to improper bonding with her mother   
   > after birth.  So they decided to correct it by forcing her to be born   
   > again, which involved putting her inside several sleeping bags to   
   > simulate the birth canal and then forcing her to wriggle out to   
   > simulate the birthing process.  To make it more realistic they sat   
   > on top of her and when she began screaming that she couldn't breathe   
   > they assured the mother that she was lying.  Of course she died of   
   > suffocation, and the psychologists tried to deflect blame by claiming   
   > that the sacred writings of Freud made no mention of the necessity   
   > of oxygen.   
   >   
   > Oh, and I'll add a third example of that "forensic psychologist" who   
   > testified in the Andrea Yates murder case a few years ago (the Texas   
   > woman who drowed her 5 kids in the tub).  The prosecution paid him   
   > to discredit Yates' insanity defense (he would have happily whored   
   > his testimony for the defense for enough money), and he testified to   
   > the jury that she wasn't insane, that he knew for a fact because he   
   > had watched an episode of "Law & Order" where a woman killed her kids   
   > then faked insanity to avoid the death penalty.  Citing a fictional   
   > television crime drama as evidence in a criminal trial is bad enough,   
   > but the alleged episode didn't even exist.  He either deliberately   
   > lied or his cracked-out brain was unable to distinguish reality from   
   > crime drama plots he thought should be written, most likely a result   
   > of his subconcious sexual feelings towards his mother.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)