Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.folklore.urban    |    Urban legends and folklore    |    51,410 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 49,517 of 51,410    |
|    jasmine.wu02@gmail.com to Keith D. Tyler    |
|    Re: "Cyber"stalker and Toronto family?    |
|    09 Nov 13 18:17:07    |
      On Thursday, May 1, 1997 12:00:00 AM UTC-7, Keith D. Tyler wrote:       > L. Shelton Bumgarner (bumvan@infi.net) wrote:       > : caj@moriarty.math.niu.edu (Xcott Craver) wrote:       > : >Every newspaper/news magazine should have at least one reporter       > : >to sniff out such obvious bullshit as a S00PERHACKER breaking into       > : >someone's toaster though the internet.       >       > Furthermore, the story had NOTHING to do with the Internet, or even with       > computers. The word "computer" never even appeared in any of the stories       > -- but the prefix "cyber" was nearly ubiquitous. That bugs me even more.       > And I used to a journalism major.       >       > PS there hasn't been an influential newsman who was "versed in science"       > since the New York Times circa 1933. And his type wasn't common.       >       > : >It can't be good for the Net for laypeople (and lawmakers!) to believe       > : >such things are possible.       >       > It isn't, but... (sigh) since when does the general public know whats       > "good" for them?       >       > : Whenever I see a REALLY stupid media peice about Net related, I think       > : there was a serious jamming of the system because:       >       > : A editor let it pass because he/she thought it was worthwile.       >       > In this case, neither. It came in over the wire, and contained the word       > "cyber." That pretty much did it. The wire editor, not being knowledgeable       > of the subjects (and note, i dont claim that its his job to be) involved,       > assumed it was one of them hot, nouveaux, electronic stories.       >       > : The Winner of the PEDinator Award for Journalistic "cyber" stupidity       > : for the last few weeks was the USATODAY peice that talked all about       > : the "Net's" facination with ULs, but didn't once mention       > : alt.folklore.urban.       >       > Ah. You must be referring to Usenet? They only cover the *Inter*net over       > there.       >       > --       > "A friend told me to get America Online. I said, `Why? I've already got a       > computer.'" - AOL commercial              So DID the son work alone then? He claims he worked alone but sources say       there are at least one time when the family received a call from Sommy while       their son was in the room. So if you look at the evidence, how could he have       worked by himself?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca