XPost: alt.survival, misc.survivalism, rec.crafts.metalworking   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc   
   From: scruu@fo.com   
      
   On 29 Jul 2016, Ed Huntress  posted some   
   news:r25opbp22peq3q49bl96f8nti7lsulo5vg@4ax.com:   
      
   > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:56:16 -0400, Governor Swill   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:12:31 -0400, Ed Huntress   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:36:37 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On 7/27/2016 9:23 AM, ????? ??????? wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You gun-packers failed to see that "gun" is the problem in   
   >>>>> the "gun problem".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>I, and a hundred million others like me, could each own a   
   >>>>thousand guns, and ten thousand rounds of ammo for each gun,   
   >>>>without increasing the "gun problem" one little bit.   
   >>>   
   >>>A really interesting question is, if you have 100 people carrying   
   >>>openly at a political rally, and five of them are terrorists who start   
   >>>shooting the others, how long does it take before just one person is   
   >>>left standing?   
   >>   
   >>You'll never get there.  The 95 would have found and killed the 5   
   >>before you could even get close.   
   >>   
   >>Swill   
   >   
   > Since you have no way to know how they would "find" them, and you're   
   > guessing, here's my guess:   
   >   
   > It will start like a chain reaction. The terrorists will shoot eight   
   > or ten before anyone can shoot back. Those who shoot back will mostly   
   > miss their targets (most people do when shooting under such extreme   
   > stress). They kill some other armed citizens.   
      
   Only cops miss like that when shooting under stress.  Militarists and   
   hunters take what they want down with a couple shots and minimal   
   collateral damage.   
      
   > Everyone will look the same; the terrorists know who each other is,   
   > but they look like everyone else. So the shooting will quickly become   
   > random. Dozens will die. The only ones who will be reasonably   
   > disciplined, prepared, and calm will be the terrorists. They'll just   
   > keep shooting until the statistics work against them and they get   
   > shot.   
      
   Ed, you're dumber than a fucking rock.  The terrorists will have automatic   
   weapons because they don't give a flying fuck about your puny democrat gun   
   control laws that penalize law-abiding American citizens.   
      
   The Americans will have hand guns.   
      
   Understand Ed?  Terrorists automatic weapons, Americans hand guns.  Got it   
   now?   
      
   You think that will be hard for everyone to figure out?  10 handguns   
   firing at one Democrat with a rifle, I call that even.   
      
   > How many will die? There might be a statistical way to give us some   
   > guidance here, but I don't know what it is. My best guess is that the   
   > shooting will continue until the last terrorist is dead. By then...oh,   
   > maybe 3/4 or more of the armed citizens. And most will have died from   
   > being shot by other armed citizens.   
      
   It doesn't matter how many die as long as your democrat sponsored   
   terrorists do.  Look at it this way, 50 faggots died in Orlando.  That was   
   a test run.  Think how many they can get in a Casino full of old fuckers   
   in motorized wheelchairs.   
      
   > It's an interesting thought exercize, huh?   
      
   *exercise.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)