XPost: alt.survival, misc.survivalism, rec.crafts.metalworking
XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc
From: huntres23@optonline.net
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 01:20:58 -0400, Gugyy?? ?????? ? ?????????eJArX
wrote:
>Democrats = Below Avg Intelligence wrote on 7/30/2016 12:13 AM:
>> On 29 Jul 2016, Ed Huntress posted some
>> news:r25opbp22peq3q49bl96f8nti7lsulo5vg@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:56:16 -0400, Governor Swill
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:12:31 -0400, Ed Huntress
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:36:37 -0600, Just Wondering
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/27/2016 9:23 AM, ????? ??????? wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You gun-packers failed to see that "gun" is the problem in
>>>>>>> the "gun problem".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I, and a hundred million others like me, could each own a
>>>>>> thousand guns, and ten thousand rounds of ammo for each gun,
>>>>>> without increasing the "gun problem" one little bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> A really interesting question is, if you have 100 people carrying
>>>>> openly at a political rally, and five of them are terrorists who start
>>>>> shooting the others, how long does it take before just one person is
>>>>> left standing?
>>>>
>>>> You'll never get there. The 95 would have found and killed the 5
>>>> before you could even get close.
>>>>
>>>> Swill
>>>
>>> Since you have no way to know how they would "find" them, and you're
>>> guessing, here's my guess:
>>>
>>> It will start like a chain reaction. The terrorists will shoot eight
>>> or ten before anyone can shoot back. Those who shoot back will mostly
>>> miss their targets (most people do when shooting under such extreme
>>> stress). They kill some other armed citizens.
>>
>> Only cops miss like that when shooting under stress. Militarists and
>> hunters take what they want down with a couple shots and minimal
>> collateral damage.
>>
>>> Everyone will look the same; the terrorists know who each other is,
>>> but they look like everyone else. So the shooting will quickly become
>>> random. Dozens will die. The only ones who will be reasonably
>>> disciplined, prepared, and calm will be the terrorists. They'll just
>>> keep shooting until the statistics work against them and they get
>>> shot.
>>
>> Ed, you're dumber than a fucking rock. The terrorists will have automatic
>> weapons because they don't give a flying fuck about your puny democrat gun
>> control laws that penalize law-abiding American citizens.
>>
>> The Americans will have hand guns.
>>
>> Understand Ed? Terrorists automatic weapons, Americans hand guns. Got it
>> now?
>
>
>Please clarify.
He can't. He's talking through his hat.
>Can handguns be automatic too?
They're extremely rare, and any made after 1986 are illegal for sale.
He's all mixed up between "automatic" and "semi-automatic."
>Is it a law that CCW
>cannot be automatic handguns?
They're rare collectors' items, most dating back to WWII or earlier.
The only recent ones in the US are a few "manufacturer's samples,"
which FFL holders can possess under certain circumstances.
You're talking about guns that are of historical interest and that are
all but nonexistent in the US.
>>
>> You think that will be hard for everyone to figure out? 10 handguns
>> firing at one Democrat with a rifle, I call that even.
>
>How can 100 handgun packers not see 5 among them are slinging rifles?
The situation we're talking about is one in which nearly EVERYONE is
carrying a rifle. Like this:
http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/firearm-activists-walk-armed
through-downtown-st-louis#stream/0
--
Ed Huntress
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
