XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: maximusheadroom@gmx.com   
      
   In news:BQK%D.46056$Rk4.39779@fx32.iad, Rudy Canoza    
   typed:   
      
   > On 1/16/2019 10:29 AM, Just Wondering wrote:   
   >> On 1/16/2019 11:06 AM, Reply to: albasani.kook@albasani.net wrote:   
      
   >>> Last Tuesday a 25-year-old woman in Chicago was waiting at the   
   >>> bus stop in the early morning when she was approached by a 19-   
   >>> year-old man with a gun. The Chicago Tribune describes what   
   >>> happened next:   
      
   >>> SEE ALSO: "The View" debates: Is every Republican who supports   
   >>> building the wall racist?   
      
   >>> Laavion Goings Jr. was out of jail only two months when the 19-   
   >>> year-old walked up to a bus stop about a block from his home,   
   >>> pulled out a gun and tried to rob a woman on the Far South Side.   
      
   >>> But the woman had a gun too and fired first, hitting Goings in   
   >>> the chest, according to Chicago police. The teen ran back to his   
   >>> home and made it as far as a stairwell in the foyer of a   
   >>> building before collapsing in the 400 block of West 103rd Street.   
      
   >>> That's where officers found him shortly before 6 a.m. Tuesday,   
   >>> just minutes after the shooting. He died within an hour at   
   >>> Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn.   
      
   >>> Video from across the street apparently captured the incident so   
   >>> police know exactly what happened. The intended victim had a   
   >>> concealed carry permit for her gun so she is not in any trouble   
   >>> with authorities. This is a clear case of self-defense.   
      
   >> People have a fundamental right to protect themselves. The woman   
   >> should not have had to ask government permission (a permit) to be   
   >> able to defend herself.   
   > "Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not   
   > unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and   
   > courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry   
   > *any* weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose."   
      
   > Justice Antonin Scalia - District of Columbia v. Heller   
   > June 26, 2008   
      
   > A requirement for a permit to carry a concealed weapon is not an   
   > infringement of the right.  This is settled.   
      
   Only if open carry is legal. Otherwise, charging a fee to exercise a right is   
   an infringement.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)