Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.folklore.urban    |    Urban legends and folklore    |    51,410 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 50,681 of 51,410    |
|    Deplorable Redneck to All    |
|    Socialist Democrats slitting wrists! MSN    |
|    26 Mar 19 09:31:02    |
      XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.usa, alt.society.liberalism       XPost: alt.connecticut       From: deplorable.redneck@nytimes.com              No collusion.              MSNBC host Chris Matthews expressed outrage on Friday upon       hearing reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had       completed his Russia investigation and submitted it to the       attorney general -- with further indictments not expected.              Matthews began his show by summarizing the breaking news, but       stressed that Mueller handed his report to the Department of       Justice “without ever directly interviewing the president of the       United States.”                     “That means no charges against the president, his children or       his associates after all those meetings with the Russians,” a       visibly upset Matthews told his viewers.              The liberal cable news host opened the discussion to the panel,       telling them his “biggest question” was “How can the president       be pointed to as leading collusion with Russia, aiding a Russian       conspiracy to interfere with our elections if none of his       henchmen, none of his children, none of his associates have been       indicted?”               Embedded video              Hardball       ?       @hardball        "My only conclusion is that the President transmitted to       Mueller that he would take the 5th. He would never talk to him       and therefore, Mueller decided it wasn't worth the subpoena       fight." @KenDilanianNBC on Mueller concluding his report.       #Hardball              553       4:07 PM - Mar 22, 2019       758 people are talking about this              Twitter Ads info and privacy       NBC News national security reporter Ken Dilanian responded by       telling Matthews that Trump couldn’t be indicted “in a criminal       sense” since Mueller’s office “didn’t have it,” adding that the       president “couldn’t conspire with himself.”              “Maybe he missed the boat here,” Matthews responded. “Because we       know about the Trump Tower meeting in June 2016, we know about       the meeting at the cigar bar with Kilimnik. My God, we know       about all of those meetings with Kislyak at the Republican       convention in Cleveland. All these dots we’re now to believe       don’t connect.”              “Well, that’s the conclusion in front of us,” Dilanian told       Matthews. “All of that stuff was suggestive, it didn’t prove       anything.”              “Why was there never an interrogation of this president?”       Matthews shot back. “We were told for weeks by experts, ‘You       cannot deal with an obstruction-of-justice charge or       investigation without getting the motive… How could they let       Trump off the hook?... He will not be charged with obstruction       of justice or collusion without having to sit down with the       Special Counsel Mueller and answer his damn questions. How could       that happen?”              https://www.foxnews.com/politics/msnbcs-chris-matthews-livid-       over-mueller-report-how-could-they-let-trump-off-the-hook                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca