From: bruce2bowser@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, January 13, 1997 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, R.Swenson wrote:   
   > Looking at the latest ad for a Barbie Doll :"Bob Mackie's Moon   
   > Goddess Barbie (She's Heavenly): a collectors doll for $200. (+ or -)   
   > ........and it made me think about the item I read once concerning the   
   > bad press Barbie gets from Mother's who say the doll is a bad thing   
   > to buy for young girls who view the Barbie doll as the way most men   
   > and women want the average American woman to look ; a most desirable   
   > but impossible figure (in most cases) to imitate.   
   > With her tall,slim body,blond hair,blue eyes,super long perfect legs   
   > and full breasts she is a man's fantacy sexual partner. . . . .if she   
   > were real,instead of flesh colored plastic. Some have said that if   
   > she were a real woman ,Barbie would be six feet tall and have 37D cup   
   > size breasts, 34 inch waist and 36 inch hips.   
   > Are these measurements correct? What have you read? Or do you   
   > care?   
      
   Regarding the movie here in the year 2023,  I think the producer wants to   
   completely change Barbie's original body according to political correctness,   
   maybe?  Corporate correctness?  Some contrived 'compliance'?   
   What most women somehow want to see in an appearance as disarming, instead of   
   the original 1960s extremely threatening very rare bombshell appearance (that   
   you hardly ever see).   
      
   The producer should admit all this first, right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)