home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.food.vegan      Yeah but beef tastes good...      19,117 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 17,242 of 19,117   
   dh@. to AlleyOop@nul.vod   
   Re: Michael Jackson, vegetarian, dead at   
   09 Jul 09 14:51:47   
   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.california   
      
   On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:33:55 -0500, AlleyOop@nul.vod wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:30:55 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
   >   
   >>John Mayson wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, K wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> John Mayson wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, K wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> It isn't an issue at all killing carrots.  The problem for people   
   >>>>>> who claim to be vegetarian for ethical reasons is that animals are   
   >>>>>> killed in the course of producing vegetable crops.  There is no such   
   >>>>>> thing as produce that is free of animal deaths.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I have never killed anything with my garden, therefor there is such a   
   >>>>> thing as produce that is free from animal deaths.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You don't eat only food from your garden.  You eat some commercially   
   >>>> grown and distributed food, too.  The production of that food causes   
   >>>> animals to die.   
   >>>   
   >>> No.... the OP claimed "animals are killed in the course of producing   
   >>> vegetable crops".  I'm pointing out no animals have ever been killed by   
   >>> my garden.   
   >>>   
   >>> John   
   >>   
   >>While it is possible to raise crops by hand without killing   
   >>animals, it is not possible to feed the human race with   
   >>individually hand-tended gardens. Also, even most small   
   >>gardens must be defended from pests like slugs.   
   >>   
   >   
   >And rabbets and in some areas deer.   
   >   
   >   
   >>I understand the squeamishness people feel about killing   
   >>animals, but at a certain point it becomes a pathology.   
   >   
   >People who kill animals for food do not enjoy the act. If it's not   
   >done they don't eat!   
      
     · Vegans contribute to the deaths of animals by their use of   
   wood and paper products, electricity, roads and all types of   
   buildings, their own diet, etc... just as everyone else does.   
   What they try to avoid are products which provide life   
   (and death) for farm animals, but even then they would have   
   to avoid the following items containing animal by-products   
   in order to be successful:   
      
   tires, paper, upholstery, floor waxes, glass, water   
   filters, rubber, fertilizer, antifreeze, ceramics, insecticides,   
   insulation, linoleum, plastic, textiles, blood factors, collagen,   
   heparin, insulin, solvents, biodegradable detergents, herbicides,   
   gelatin capsules,  adhesive tape, laminated wood products,   
   plywood, paneling, wallpaper and wallpaper paste, cellophane   
   wrap and tape, abrasives, steel ball bearings   
      
       The meat industry provides life for the animals that it   
   slaughters, and the animals live and die as a result of it   
   as animals do in other habitats. They also depend on it for   
   their lives as animals do in other habitats. If people consume   
   animal products from animals they think are raised in decent   
   ways, they will be promoting life for more such animals in the   
   future. People who want to contribute to decent lives for   
   livestock with their lifestyle must do it by being conscientious   
   consumers of animal products, because they can not do it by   
   being vegan.   
       From the life and death of a thousand pound grass raised   
   steer and whatever he happens to kill during his life, people   
   get over 500 pounds of human consumable meat...that's well   
   over 500 servings of meat. From a grass raised dairy cow people   
   get thousands of dairy servings. Due to the influence of farm   
   machinery, and *icides, and in the case of rice the flooding and   
   draining of fields, one serving of soy or rice based product is   
   likely to involve more animal deaths than hundreds of servings   
   derived from grass raised animals. Grass raised animal products   
   contribute to fewer wildlife deaths, better wildlife habitat, and   
   better lives for livestock than soy or rice products. ·   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca