XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, soc.culture.indian, soc.culture.arabic   
      
   On Sun, 16 May 2010 Goo lied:   
      
   >On Sun, 16 May 2010 12:15:21 -0400, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:06:10 -0700, Goo wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 17:46:17 -0400, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:18:56 -0700, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 07:33:51 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"    
   bunghole-jonnie@lycos.com> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On May 12, 10:50 pm, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 5/12/2010 8:46 PM, Mr.Cumstain, in full *meltdown*, shrieked:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> > On May 12, 2:31 pm, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>>>> >> On 5/12/2010 1:01 PM, Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, loser - lied:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >>> On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:56:08 -0700 (PDT), fanabba   
   >>>>>>> >>>     wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >>>> On May 12, 1:36?pm, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >>>>> They probably can't. ?However, a good first effort would be to   
   shut up   
   >>>>>>> >>>>> and stop nagging people.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >>>> Shutting up has been tried. It has not worked.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >>>       Here [is some snippage that has nothing to do with the topic]   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >> Coming into existence - "life" - is not a benefit for farm animals,   
   Goo.   
   >>>>>>> >>    Sorry.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> > I like this one   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> > ""Veg*nism" certainly doesn't harm any living farm animals.   
   >>>>>>> > And if everyone adopted "veg*nism", no farm animals would   
   >>>>>>> > live in bad conditions."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So?-   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>So maybe you should STFU and take a few pointers on how to turn YOUR   
   >>>>>>image around. It's pretty messed up.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>So, maybe you should show the relevance of that statement.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    The relevance is the fact that by your own claims you clearly   
   >>>>agree with vegans on practically everything Goober, including the   
   >>>>fact that you think they "should" be vegans.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"People who don't want them to exist should be "vegans".   
   >>>>"Vegans" aren't interested in contributing to lives of any   
   >>>>quality for farm animals:  they don't want there to be farm   
   >>>>animals." - Goo   
   >>>   
   >>>No, I don't - not from my "own claims" at all   
   >>   
   >>    LOL! Yes Goober OBVIOUSLY you do since YOU claimed that   
   >>people who don't want them to exist "should" be vegans.   
   >   
   >I don't.  I obviously don't   
      
       Don't what Goober? What are you now trying to lie that you   
   don't do, Goo?   
      
   >>>>Do you want people to believe you're stupid enough to criticise   
   >>>>vegans for doing what you yourself have proclaimed they "should"   
   >>>>be doing, Goo?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)