XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   From: george@si.not   
      
   On 3/10/2011 3:48 PM, dh@. wrote:   
   > On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:32:44 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >   
      
   >>>     Life can and often does have positive value for animals,   
      
   Meaningless blabber.   
      
      
   >>   
   >> Both of the animals in the theoretical example above had "life" in exactly   
   >> the same measure and manner, yet one suffered while the other thrived. That   
   >> PROVES that "life" is not the source of benefit.   
      
   >      It's a benefit which makes all others possible,   
      
   *Wrong*.  It's a condition that is required for any benefit, but it is   
   not, itself, a benefit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)