XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:05:23 +0100, Seum  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:43:40 +0100, Seum  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I haven't eaten meat or fish since 1972 and recently I find that I am   
   >>> lacking some substitute for DHA. This can be made from fish and it is   
   >>> not expensive, but making it from vegetables has a cost that is   
   >>> ridiculously high.   
   >>>   
   >>> Is there any alternative?   
   >>   
   >>     Would there be any in grass raised beef? Then you would be helping   
   yourself,   
   >> contributing to decent lives for livestock, and contributing to something   
   that   
   >> works well for wildlife too. And at the same time contributing to less   
   wildlife   
   >> deaths than you probably would by eating most grain products, and surely   
   less   
   >> than by eating rice products. Or grass raised sheep or goat if you don't   
   want to   
   >> eat beef...   
   >   
   >You must be kidding.   
      
       What I pointed out is true, though some people might find such facts   
   amusing   
   somehow.   
      
   >Livestock is polluting our atmosphere and poisoning   
   >our streams and rivers. What we need is faaaaaar less livestock.   
      
       Plowing and harrowing, treating with chemicals and harvesting etc large   
   areas of grain fields is much harder on the environment than cattle are by   
   eating grass. How can you be unaware of that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)