XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:37:30 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   > wrote in message news:sg2787tue3t802drqhtm8r5gvf5cqb1d38@4ax.com...   
   >> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:13:24 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:31:42 -0700, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:13:35 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:3ian77l1grh81tm9ata05ctcsu93f686a6@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:10:36 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:mcnh775qsicul5rvlghib2g98uf0m6n7sj@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    You BOAST that you can't appreciate them. Are you boasting that   
   >>>>>>>> you   
   >>>>>>>> can't   
   >>>>>>>> appreciate them even when you want to think eliminationists had   
   >>>>>>>> something   
   >>>>>>>> to do   
   >>>>>>>> with them?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>You   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    Do you want us to believe you can:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> a. never appreciate them.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> b. appreciate them only when you think eliminationists had something   
   >>>>>> to do   
   >>>>>> with   
   >>>>>> making them of positive value.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> c. appreciate them when you think eliminationists had something to do   
   >>>>>> with   
   >>>>>> making them of positive value and also under some other circumstances.   
   >>>>>> If   
   >>>>>> so,   
   >>>>>> explain which other circumstances and why.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Your so-called "appreciation" is self-serving bullshit.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    So you can't appreciate lives of positive value even when you want to   
   >>>> think   
   >>>>your beloved PeTA had something to do with it.   
   >>>   
   >>>I said /your/ so-called "appreciation" is self-serving   
   >>   
   >>    I accept that to mean you can't appreciate lives of positive value even   
   >> when   
   >> you want to think eliminationists had something to do with them being that   
   >> way.   
   >   
   >No you don't   
      
       That's a blatant lie since at this point it's all you leave people to   
   believe about you. If you want people to believe something else, then you need   
   to provide reason for them to believe something else. Duh!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)