XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.animals.rights.promotion   
      
   On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:28:31 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   >On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:00:15 -0800, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:36:47 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> wrote in message news:62i2e71vobtkapeoaqrk9bgngd6fcic640@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:57:58 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:56:36 -0800, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:23:23 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:bvagd7drjll6ds6nvounhd5a31ltl21mua@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:17 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0800, dh@. pointed out:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>    All I did was to point out a fact. Apparently it's another one of   
   >>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>facts that you people hate. So it's not me that disgusts you, but the   
   >>>>>>>>>>fact is   
   >>>>>>>>>>what disgusts you. Why does it "disgust" you that what I've been   
   >>>>>>>>>>pointing   
   >>>>>>>>>>out   
   >>>>>>>>>>for ten years, has been true for ten thousand years?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>A meaningless one.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    For one thing it's not meaningless and for another even if it was   
   >>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>> would   
   >>>>>>>> be no reason for you to hate it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Vegans don't promote life for livestock animals, you   
   >>>>>>>>>don't promote life for porcupines, who cares?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    People who want to promote decent AW over elimination. Doiiieee.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>That is an invalid dichotomy. Doiiieee.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>"Decent AW"  is promoted over "poor AW"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    It's also promoted over eliminations.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>By you   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    LOL!!! By anyone who favors decent AW over elimination.   
   >>. . .   
   >>>invalid dichotomy   
   >>   
   >>    Explain how you want people to try to pretend it is. Go:   
   >   
   >Non-parallel   
   >   
   >"Decent AW"...relates a scenario where   
   >livestock animals are...bred   
   . . .   
   >"elimination" ... relates to a scenario where no animals are bred   
      
       Then the choice between the two lifestyles isn't a dichotomy at all, not a   
   false one. BTW it's also not a kangaroo or a tv dinner, both of which are   
   equally significant to it not being a dichotomy or an invalid dichotomy either,   
   which is no significance at all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)