XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.animals.rights.promotion   
      
   On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:51:08 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   > wrote in message news:nu9if7pp6sl4j62e2d3k43ivbrvva3rvip@4ax.com...   
   >> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:52:14 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> wrote in message news:dln7f7p2plcru205msb6o6bgv23lgt6r7v@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:59:54 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>A person who consumes no animal products   
   >>>>>has no connection to the treatment of livestock   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    They only contribute to the deaths of wildlife with their lifestyle   
   >>>   
   >>>Vegan agriculture also supports wildlife.   
   >>   
   >> "Wild animals on average suffer more than farm animals,   
   >> I think that's obvious." - "Dutch"   
   >>   
   >>>>but veganism does nothing for livestock.   
   >>>   
   >>>That's not true, less demand may lead to less crowding and slower factory   
   >>>lines   
   >>   
   >>    More likely it would go the other way.   
   >>   
   >>>, that helps livestock. Consuming meat doesn't help them.   
   >>   
   >> "Every consumer choice promotes animals to experience   
   >> life." - Dutch   
   >>   
   >> "I am fully aware that billions of animals exist only because   
   >> humans raise them for food, that's obvious." - "Dutch"   
   >>   
   >> "The method of husbandry determines whether or not the life   
   >> has positive or negative value to the animal." - "Dutch"   
   >>   
   >> "Good "lives" (sequences of physical and mental   
   >> experiences) are beneficial to animals." - "Dutch"   
   >   
   >Thanks for pasting in my points, too bad you can't grasp them.   
      
       They refer to how consumers influence livestock.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)