XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   From: invalid@invalid.invalid   
      
   dh@. wrote in news:1danf7pm4vbahva7lvlm7oaea1tpb5cspk@4ax.com:   
      
   >> You would not say the same about child sex abuser thinking   
   >> of creating a baby for his own purposes, would you?   
   >   
   > Since livestock aren't generally sexually abused by their   
   > farmers there's no reason to try comparing those   
   > completely different situations as if they weren't   
   > completely different.   
      
   You don't think it's okay to eat babies just as long if you were not eating   
   them the babies would not be born in the first place, do you?  Why should   
   it be different for animals in the rich first world where we have more   
   healthy alternatives?   
      
   --   
   Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons   
   http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/jahbulon.html   
      
   "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you,   
     then they fight you, then you win"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)