XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:34:00 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   > wrote in message news:3dtug71hm0issv9dvitdhlds9lidnj310i@4ax.com...   
   >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:12:27 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> wrote in message news:e3hpg75kn1o1469ai8id1pjbjlvf4gf3fi@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:06:26 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:57lhg7lo7lfsi5begucfj3ro1i0pq9v2op@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:10:15 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Every product derived from the animal shares in the resultant death   
   >>>>>>>toll.   
   >>>>>>>Why would pet food and leather be exempt?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    Because it was only raised for food.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Then no leather or pet food were produced.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    It was raised for food, and leather and pet food are made from the   
   >>>> waste. It   
   >>>> would still be raised for food regardless of what the waste is used for.   
   >>>   
   >>>It's not waste, any more than the meat is waste.   
   >>   
   >>    LOL! You certainly have some amusing ideas. You think sometimes Tbones   
   >> and   
   >> Ribeyes are waste products of the leather industry...LOL...   
   >   
   >I said neither is waste.   
      
       You lied, which is not the least bit unusual for you. Hadn't you noticed?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)