XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.animals.rights.promotion   
      
   On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:44:16 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   > wrote in message news:3ffgj7hi6s2e2so93tcour0h0vmasthg6a@4ax.com...   
   >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:08:21 -0800, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> wrote   
   >>>> the billions of animals   
   >>>> which are raised for food will always be dependant on consumers   
   >>>> for their existence. ·   
   >>>   
   >>>SO WHAT? As a consumer of meat and many other animal products, and a   
   >>>supporter of most farming, I don't give a shit that livestock "depend on   
   >>>consumers for their existence".  That is a completely meaningless factoid.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>    Not to those of us who honestly favor decent lives for livestock over   
   >> elimination.   
   >   
   >So it somehow makes you feel good does it? How nice for you, and creepy.   
      
       LOL!!! Is it "creepy" to you that I can appreciate the lives of livestock I   
   don't consume any parts of too...LOL...or only those I do? If both [chortle] do   
   you think it's *more* creepy that I appreciate those I do consume parts of than   
   those I don't? Why or why not?   
   . . .   
   >"elimination" is the alternative to lives of any quality.   
      
       Doy which is why anyone who honestly favors decent lives over elimination   
   should be opposed to elimination, doy again, and your inability to comprehend   
   much less appreciate that significant aspect of the situation is one of the   
   ways   
   you reveal yourself, doy yet again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)