Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.food.vegan    |    Yeah but beef tastes good...    |    19,117 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,878 of 19,117    |
|    dh@. to Goo    |
|    Re: Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be     |
|    19 Mar 12 15:25:20    |
      XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, talk.politics.animals, alt       food.vegan.science              On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:51:20 -0700, Goo wrote:              >On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:03:03 -0400, dh@. pointed out:       >       >> Sometimes you agree with yourself Goob and apparently this is one of       them,       >>but other times you want to try pretending you disagree with yourself about       some       >>things and you have also been known to deny that some of those quotes of       yours       >>are quotes of yours.       >       >I always agree with myself              "The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to       experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration       whatever" - Goo              "I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS*       of consideration." - Goo              "the "getting to experience life" deserves NO       moral consideration, and is given none" - Goo              "I also give the not-yet-begun lives of animals       that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a lot of       consideration" - Goo              "There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo              >, Fuckwit. I never claim to have made a "mistake"              ""Life", by which you mean coming into existence, is not       a benefit at all" - Goo              "We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether       existing animals "benefit" from living." - Goo              "Those "lives of positive value" are only meaningful       *IF* the livestock exist. " - Goo              "The topic is not and never has been whether or not       existing animals enjoy living." - Goo              "IF they exist, then they can benefit (or not) from the       aspects of their lives." - Goo              "No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo              "We are not and never were talking about benefits for       existing entities" - Goo              "Coming into existence is not a benefit to them" - Goo       . . .       > I always know what I'm saying.              "Set your clock back by an hour" - Goo              "I didn't say to set your clock back an hour" - Goo              "When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the       existence we know" - Goo              "I never said they "move from 'pre-existence'"" - Goo              "we don't know if that move improves its welfare" - Goo              "the deliberate killing of animals for use by humans DOES       deserve moral consideration, and gets it." - Goo              "Intent doesn't matter" - Goo              "ONLY deliberate human killing deserves any moral       consideration." - Goo              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca