XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, talk.politics.animals, alt   
   food.vegan.science   
      
   On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:01:26 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   > wrote in message news:g5j6o71tmkrfj1q5dorkc2vuil8jkjsn16@4ax.com...   
   >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:56:13 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> wrote   
   >>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:26:54 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>Your "consideration" doesn't benefit any livestock.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    It does by resulting in options like cage free and free range eggs   
   >>>   
   >>>That's a lie, consideration of animal suffering,   
   >>   
   >>    That's part of it   
   >   
   >It's all of it.   
      
       Liar.   
      
   >>>...[appreciation for lives of positive value for livestock animals]   
   >>>is beyond laughable.   
   >>   
   >>    Not to everyone.   
   >   
   >Explain the distinction between "consideration of animal suffering" and   
   >"appreciation for lives of positive value for livestock animals".   
      
       Consideration of suffering is considering a negative aspect. The other   
   considers a positive aspect which is why you've been opposing it all these   
   years.   
      
   >If I "consider animal suffering" then I obviously "appreciate lives of   
   >positive value for livestock animals"   
      
       Are you now claiming to appreciate lives of positive value for livestock   
   animals? If so, what made you change your mind all of a sudden do you know? Why   
   doesn't it make you feel dirty any more?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)