Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.food.vegan    |    Yeah but beef tastes good...    |    19,117 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,971 of 19,117    |
|    dh@. to Goo    |
|    Re: Moral considerability    |
|    30 Apr 12 18:41:36    |
      XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.philosophy, talk.politics.animals       XPost: alt.politics              On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:50:55 -0700, Goo wrote:              >On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:29:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:       >       >>On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:28:12 -0700, Goo wrote:       >>       >>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, dh@. quoted Goo revealing that       >>> quality of life doesn't matter to him:       >>>       >>>>"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude       >>>>than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo       >       >You give the quality of their lives *zero* consideration, Goo.               Your quote above proves that quality means nothing to you, Goo.       . . .       >>>>"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing       >>>>of the animals erases all of it." - Goo       >>>>       >>>>""appreciation for decent AW" doesn't *MEAN* anything" - Goo       >>>>       >>>>""appreciation for decent AW" doesn't mean anything." - Goo       >>>>       >>>>"NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo       >>>>       >>>>"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo       . . .       >>>>"The topic is not and never has been whether or not       >>>>existing animals enjoy living." - Goo       . . .       >>>>"it is not "better" that the animal exist, no matter       >>>>its quality of live" - Goo       >       >The part to which you give *no* consideration, Goo. I've proved it, via       >your own quotes.               I proved that you give no consideration to the part about quality of life       by       posting your quotes Goob. You have confirmed that it means nothing to you, but       I       proved it to begin with by quoting you specifically saying so.              >>>>"It is not "better" in any moral way, and not in *any* way       >>>>at all to the animal itself, that the animal exists." - Goo       >>>>       >>>>"Being born is not a benefit in any way. It can't be." - Goo       >>>>       >>>>""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of       >>>>their deaths" - Goo              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca