XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, talk.politics.animals, alt   
   food.vegan.science   
      
   On Tue, 1 May 2012 10:26:36 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
      
   > wrote   
   >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:22:07 -0700, "Dutch"  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>I don't oppose considering what happens when AW is successful, I oppose   
   >>>>>"considering what they get out of it" because it doesn't accomplish   
   >>>>>anything.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    It suggests that providing lives of positive value can be considered   
   >>>> ethically equivalent or superior to elimination, which is why you're   
   >>>> opposed to   
   >>>> it.   
   >>>   
   >>>It does nothing.   
   >>   
   >>    That's a blatant lie since it does what I pointed out, and we both know   
   >> it.   
   >   
   >It doesn't do what you think it does   
      
       It suggests that providing lives of positive value can be considered   
   ethically equivalent or superior to elimination, which is why you're   
   opposed to it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)