328b7de2   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.philosophy, talk.politics.animals   
   XPost: alt.politics   
      
   On Mon, 7 May 2012 16:18:44 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   wrote:   
      
   >On May 7, 7:03 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 4 May 2012 10:31:07 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >On Apr 24, 7:27 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >> >> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >It's your job to provide a satisfactory definition   
   >>   
   >> >>     It means lives that are good.   
   >>   
   >> >Okay fine, shame you couldn't have said that when I first asked,   
   >>   
   >>     I overestimated your ability to figure things out.   
   >>   
   >   
   >You did not provide sufficient information for someone to know what   
   >you meant.   
      
       Not enough for YOU to figure it out, but a less clueless person would have   
   had no problem.   
      
   >> >or better yet simply used the phrase "good lives".   
   >>   
   >>     I explained why I don't use that way of referring to it, but the   
   specifics   
   >> of why are beyond your ability to appreciate apparently or you would have   
   been   
   >> able to appreciate why the entire time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)