XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:44:09 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
      
   >Rupert wrote:   
   >> On Jul 3, 6:06 am, Delvin Benet  wrote:   
   >>> On 7/2/2012 12:50 PM, Rupert wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Jul 2, 9:31 am, Delvin Benet  wrote:   
   >>>>> There is nothing inherently unethical about eating meat.   
   >>>   
   >>>> Modern meat production inflicts considerable suffering on animals. It   
   >>>> is not justifiable to inflict so much suffering just so that we can   
   >>>> enjoy the taste of their flesh.   
   >>>   
   >>> There is nothing inherently unethical about eating meat.   
   >>   
   >> It is unclear whether you disagree with my statement.   
   >>   
   >   
   >It is unclear whether you disagree with his.   
      
       Rupert doesn't know what to think. He wants to be an eliminationist and an   
   AW supporter both at the same time, but since it doesn't work that way he can't   
   figure out what he thinks he thinks. He doesn't want to "give up" either   
   completely different position. As do you, he also still takes refuge in the   
   misnomer and is afraid to give it up.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)