XPost: alt.atheism, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:37:45 -0500, Samuel Harrigon    
   wrote:   
      
   >Goo lied:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> He's bullshitting, trying to be cute.  We know that what he means is   
   >> >> "future farm animals" that haven't even been conceived.   
   >> >   
   >> > Well, actually, no, on this particular occasion it is clear that that   
   >> > is not what he means.He's bullshitting.  He's equivocating on "unborn   
   animals", as Dutch has   
   >> already patiently explained to you.  He's done this before.Fuckwit *always*   
   means, in his bullshit expressions of his core   
   >> bullshit, unconceived "future farm animals."  That's what he means.   
   >   
   >Yes, the universe shows many examples of complexity and, indeed, may   
   >look designed to the naive, but no evidence for a designer of a universe   
   >has ever appeared. The only intellegent designers we know of come in the   
   >form of earthly based DNA life-forms.   
      
       Of course the only ones we're in any position to be able to detect are   
   those   
   same life forms, and we couldn't detect any others if they inhabitted every   
   other star system in the universe. Do you consider that fact too, or just try   
   to   
   ignore that one and if so why?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)