XPost: alt.atheism, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:57:53 -0700, Goo wrote:   
      
   >> On 8/31/2012 10:22 AM, Fred wrote:   
   >>> George Plimpton  wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/9/2012 3:07 PM, Mike Lovell wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2012-08-09, dh@.  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> [bullshit snipped]   
   >>>> ...but then by early August, you got the cunt-brained idea to start   
   >>>> using PGP when posting to Usenet.   
   >>>> What the fuck is wrong with you?  Turn it off, motherfucker.   
   >>>   
   >>> Um, ...[Goo], many people use PGP to sign postings given that UUCP   
   >>> is not an authenticated protocol and forging people's idents is   
   >>> done millions of times daily.   
   >>   
   >> Exactly how does using PGP or anything else prevent anyone from   
   >> "forging" Lovell's posts?  So, I see a post in Usenet from a "Mike   
   >> Lovell" containing a lot of PGP bullshit in the text - how do I know   
   >> it's from the authentic Mike Lovell?  In fact, I don't; no one does.   
   >   
   >So I found a discussion of this very question in a group   
   >comp.security.pgp:  http://tinyurl.com/9uf4kdu   
   >   
   >The reasons for using it are entirely unpersuasive, but I did learn   
   >something about the social pathology of those who are most likely to   
   >feel they need to use it, and now it makes perfect sense that Lovell   
   >would use it.   
      
       Well since you dishonestly alter people's quotes and dishonestly post   
   stupid   
   things AS different people Goob, anyone having exchanges with you is likely to   
   have such dishonesty directed at them BY YOU. Did you forget about that part,   
   Goober?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)