XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:11:51 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:48:14 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:45:56 -0700, the following appeared   
   >>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Goo:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   How's that "pre-existent state" thing working for you, Goo?   
   >>>   
   >>> Is that like "pre-emergent" herbicide? At least that sort of   
   >>> works, so I'd guess the answer is "not very well"...   
   >>   
   >>      Goo claims:   
   >>   
   >> "The only way that the concept "benefit from existence"   
   >> can begin to make sense semantically is if one assumes   
   >> a pre-existent state" - Goo   
   >>   
   >> and I don't believe him.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Because you're an idiot.   
      
       Try presenting any reason(s) why you think anyone should believe the Goober   
   about that. Go:   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)