XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:19:07 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:27:50 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Simple, read Salt again, this time for comprehension.   
   >>   
   >>      "If, then, thou art firm set on pork, so be it, for pork I am" - Salt   
   >   
   >Not that part, but that was helpful.   
   >   
   >> The pig lived only to be eaten.   
   >   
   >He isn't complaining about that.   
   >   
   >> If didn't specifically say it wished it had   
   >> never been born   
   >   
   >He accepts being born, to be meat.   
   >   
   >> even though your imaginary pig DID know it was going to be   
   >> killed and even that it was going to be eaten.   
   >   
   >Salt never implies that actual pigs know they will be pork chops. You're   
   >an idiot.   
      
       LOL!!! You're trying to pretend that I'm the idiot for pointing out Salt's   
   idiocy. LOL...   
   . . .   
   >You totally ignored the part of the essay that proves beyond a doubt why   
   >coming into existence does not and cannot benefit an entity.   
      
       It's not in the fantasy, but if you want us to pretend that it is then you   
   need to present what you want us to think proves it. Try. Go:   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)