XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:40:44 -0700, Goo wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:35:30 -0400, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:07:29 -0700, Goo desperately, feebly puled:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:30:22 -0400, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:42:24 -0700, Goo desperately puled:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:24:08 -0400, dh@. wrote   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:23:17 -0700, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:19:05 -0400, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    Goober what do you think is preventing you from benefitting from   
   your life   
   >>>>>>>>now? If you think it has something to do with before you existed, then   
   you need   
   >>>>>>>>to say WHAT specifically, and HOW.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Coming into existence - "getting to experience life" - is not a benefit.   
   >>>>>>>  It cannot be:  it does not improve an entity's welfare, and such a   
   >>>>>>>welfare improvement is the definition of benefit.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    How do you think that prevents you from benefitting now Goob?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>By definition   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    How do you think the definition of benefit prevents you from   
   benefitting now   
   >>>>Goob? Try to explain it without mentioning pre-existence, Goo. You can't.   
   >>>   
   >>>Coming into existence - "getting to   
   >>>experience life" - does not improve an entity's welfare   
   >>   
   >>    How do you think that's preventing you from benefitting now Goob?   
   >   
   >I've explained that, Fuckwit.  Coming into existence - "getting to   
   >experience life" - does not improve an entity's welfare   
      
       How do you think that's preventing you from benefitting now Goob?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)