9c9f4f99   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >>     So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as   
   >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which   
   Goo   
   >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It   
   seems   
   >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything   
   considering   
   >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the   
   >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not   
   itself a   
   >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >   
   >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.   
      
       If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not   
   itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)